WebQuest - Student |
MENC Standard / TI:ME Strategy |
MENC Achievement Standard |
ISTE Standard |
||
Students complete a WebQuest that invloves researching and building a music technology lab. |
8.07 CAI / Tools - Students complete a WebQuest in which they research issues from the field of music and other disciplines. |
8 - Understand relationships between music, the other arts, and disciplines outside the arts. |
NETS-S |
||
Students complete a WebQuest that invloves researching and building a music technology lab with music and non-music related aspects. |
8.15 Multimedia / Tools - The teacher designs a WebQuest for students in which they research musical, arts-related, and non-musical topics. |
8 - Understand relationships between music, the other arts, and disciplines outside the arts. |
NETS-T |
Rubric for Designing and Building a Music Technology Lab Teacher: Ms. Garrett Student: ______________________ |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category |
4 - Above Standards |
3 - Meets Standards |
2 - Approaches Standards |
1 - Below Standards |
|
Information Gathering |
Accurate information was taken from several sources in a systematic manner. |
Accurate information was taken from a couple of sources in a systematic manner. |
Accurate information was taken from a couple of sources, but not in a systematic manner. |
Information taken from 1 or fewer sources AND / OR information was not accurate. |
|
Written Plan |
Steps and materials were outlined in a fashion that could be followed by anyone without additional explanations. No teacher help was needed to accomplish this. |
Steps and materials were outlined in a fashion that could be followed by anyone without additional explanations. Some teacher help was needed to accomplish this. |
Steps and materials were outlined in a fashion but had 1-2 gaps that require explanation even after teacher feedback was given. |
Plan was seriously incomplete or not sequential even after teacher feedback. |
|
Construction Materials for Lab |
Appropriate materials were selected and creatively modified in ways that made them even better for the purpose. |
Appropriate materials were selected. |
Most of the construction materials were appropriate, but 1-2 were not. |
Construction materials were not appropriate for the purpose. |
|
Design / Quality of Building |
The Lab is implemented according to design, building plan and budget. |
The Lab is implemented according to plans, within fair range of building, planning and budget. Some help was provided by the teacher. |
1-2 items from the building, design, planning and budget were not as designed, or the quality of materials and planning had to be changed. |
The building, design, planning and budget were not as designed, quality of materials was not acceptable and Lab was not able to be implemented as written. |
|
Quality / Ease / Appropriate Use of Instruments, Software, Hardware and Books |
Items chosen offer a wide dynamic of use of electronics and materials that work well with the computers and will benefit all students. |
Items chosen offer some dynamic of use and are compatible with computers through some work with teacher helping with connections. |
Items chosen are not as easy to connect to and work with computers, and are difficult for some students to understand or operate. |
Items chosen do not work well with computers and have connection issues as well as being difficult for most students to learn to use. |
|
Demonstration |
Group or Presenter communicates clearly to demonstrate concept from research and design of the lab to finished product. The product (Lab) is accessible to all. |
Group or Presenter communicates clearly to demonstrate concept from research and design of the lab to finished product. Most of the students could follow the presentation. |
Group or Presenter is able to demonstrate some of the features of the Lab and how it could be built, but has a few areas in the design that need work or clarifying. |
Group or Presenter is not able to demonstrate the research or process of building a lab and does not have enough work done to present the information. |
|
Time And Effort |
Class time was used wisely. Much time and effort went into planning, design, and construction. The student clearly worked at home as well as at school. |
Class time was used wisely. Time and effort went into planning, design, and construction. Student could have put in more time and effort at home. |
Class time was not always used wisely, but student clearly did some additional work at home. |
Class time was not used wisely and the student put in no additional effort. |
|
Journal / Log / Website |
Journal provides a complete record of planning, construction, testing, modifications, reasons for modifications, and some reflection about the strategies used and the results which can be posted on the website. |
Journal provides a complete record of planning, construction, testing, modifications and reasons for modifications. Materials can be posted on the website with some modifications by teacher. |
Journal provides some information about planning, construction and modifications. |
Journal provides little or no information about planning and construction. |
|
Knowledge Gained |
Student can accurately answer 5 questions posed by teacher or peer related to the research, budget and process of building the lab. |
Student can accurately answer 3-4 questions posed by teacher or peer related to the research, budget and process of building the lab. |
Student can accurately answer 1-2 questions posed by teacher or peer related to the research, budget and process of building the lab. |
Student cannot accurately answer questions. |
|
Testing / Modification / Will this Lab be Useful to Other Schools as a Model? |
Clear evidence of testing and refinements based on data, musical principles or scientific principles. Other schools could use our Lab as a model. |
Clear evidence of testing and refinements. |
Some evidence of testing. |
No testing or refinements. |